Whats' happening on the follicular unit of adolescents after the COVID-19 pandemic: Severe acne is a growing problem of nowadays

Objectives: Acne is a leading skin problem in adolescents. After the end of COVID-19 pandemic, with the gradual transition to the routine life, we started to encounter more severe forms of acne in the last 6-month than we had seen before in the 10 year period of our Paediatric Dermatology outpatient clinic. Method(s): We evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, COVID infection and vaccination status, and treatment of patients who were treated at our Paediatric Dermatology outpatient clinic in the last 6 months due to severe acne. Result(s): One of our patients had acne fulminans, and four patients had acne conglobata. The common features of these patients presenting with severe acne were that they were young boys aged 15- 16 years, medium height, normal weight, and skin type 3-4. All patients had a family history of acne in their parents. They had no known comorbidities, additional treatment, history of nutritional supplement use, or accompanying arthralgia or arthritis. Four patients were initially treated with isotretinoin for severe acne, developed acne conglobata, and one developed acne fulminans during the follow-up period. Dapsone therapy was initiated in all patients according to the severity of the lesions, and adalimumab was administered to acne fulminans. Discussion(s): The frequent occurrence of severe forms of acne after the pandemic raises the question of whether COVID-19 infection or vaccination may play a role in its aetiology. Cases of mask-related acne exacerbation during COVID-19 have been well-described in the literature. However, there are no data on the effects of COVID-19 vaccination or infection on the development of severe acne. In this report, we present cases of adolescent patients with severe acne to investigate the possible reasons for the increasing number of severe acne cases presenting to our outpatient clinic during the postpandemic period.

A Unique Case of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary to Rheumatoid Lung Disease With Administration of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFα) Agent.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may experience complications directly from the disease process or from immune-modulating agents used to treat RA. Adalimumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) which has been increasingly used in the management of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Acute lung injury has been associated with the use of anti-TNFα agents, but the association with adalimumab is rare. Here we present a case of a patient with RA-associated lung disease who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome while being treated with adalimumab. Adalimumab-related lung injury is less common than lung injury associated with other anti-TNFα drugs, thus clinicians should be aware of this condition, as prompt recognition and supportive management can help prevent worsening outcomes.

Preparing for the market entry of adalimumab biosimilars in the US in 2023: A primer for specialty pharmacists.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: The impact of the market entry of adalimumab biosimilars on clinical practices and specialty pharmacies is explained. A roadmap is also provided for how pharmacists can successfully navigate this landscape. SUMMARY: Biosimilars have previously been introduced as a mechanism to help curb biologic expenditures, with biosimilars undergoing an abbreviated regulatory approval process that focuses on biosimilarity and generating product competition. Adalimumab is currently the leading product in the biologics market, generating approximately $20 to $30 billion in sales worldwide consecutively from 2019 to 2021. Many adalimumab biosimilars are slated to enter the market in 2023 and become available for patient use. However, compared to other biosimilars, adalimumab biosimilars have several unique considerations, such as interchangeability and concentration, that will impact pharmacy practices and workflows. Because pharmacists embedded in clinical practices and specialty pharmacies will be significantly involved in the processes relating to adalimumab biosimilar implementation, adoption, and use, a primer on understanding the various adalimumab biosimilar products available and considerations surrounding these products with regard to workflow and patient use is critical. Several resources are also provided to help pharmacists successfully navigate the adalimumab biosimilar landscape. CONCLUSION: The biosimilar landscape continues to evolve, and 2023 will see the launch of several adalimumab biosimilar products, which vary with regard to formulation, concentration, and interchangeability status. Pharmacists are well positioned to educate providers and patients about this landscape and help implement an efficient workflow to support adalimumab biosimilar adoption and use.

Long-Term Outcomes of Treatment With and De-Escalation From a Combination of Vedolizumab and Another Biologic or Tofacitinib for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: There are scant data on long-term outcomes of treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with a combination of advanced therapies, including after de-escalation. Method(s): We identified patients with IBD at a tertiary center who began therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) in combination with another advanced therapy (biologic or JAK inhibitor) between 2016 and 2020 and examined their outcomes through 6/1/22. We defined biochemical remission as CRP, 5 mg/L and calprotectin < 150 mcg/g, and endoscopic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (CD) 0. Short-term outcomes of this cohort were previously reported. Result(s): Fourteen patients with a median of 322 (IQR 251-322) weeks of follow up were identified. 10 had ulcerative colitis, 3 CD, and 1 indeterminate colitis. VDZ was combined with tofacitinib in 9 patients, ustekinumab in 3 and adalimumab in 2. Median time on combination therapy was 94 weeks (IQR 17-133). Eight patients achieved objective remission (3 biochemical, 5 endoscopic), 1 changed combination with subsequent endoscopic remission, 2 had primary non-response, 1 had secondary non-response, 1 stopped within 1 month due to reported adverse effect (paresthesia), and 1 lacked follow-up data. Eight patients de-escalated to a single agent, 4 at physician direction and 4 due to insurance denial. Before de-escalation, 6 had objective remission (2 biochemical, 4 endoscopic). After de-escalation, 3 patients maintained objective remission (2 biochemical, 1 endoscopic), 3 had disease flare, of which 1 required colectomy, and 2 lacked data. All 3 patients with disease flare had de-escalated following an insurance denial. Two patients remained on combination therapy through follow up: 1 has endoscopic remission after changing one drug of their combination and 1 has ongoing moderate endoscopic disease despite combination therapy. There were 2 infections requiring hospitalization (rotavirus, C. difficile), and 8 non-serious infections (5 mild SARS-COV-2, 1 peristomal cellulitis, 1 pneumonia, 1 sinus) while on combination therapy. Conclusion(s): In long-term follow up of this small cohort, there were no new signals on effectiveness or safety of combining advanced agents. De-escalation to a single agent was tolerated in half of patients with follow-up data;all patients who flared following de-escalation had adjusted therapy due to insurance denial. More data is needed to inform de-escalation decisions.

Current Prescribing Practices in Psoriatic Arthritis - Comparison between the Uk and Europe

Background/Aims Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multi-system disease with a range of management options. Treatment may vary by geographic location. We compared disease characteristics and prescribing practices in the UK and Europe in the post-Covid era. Methods The ASSIST study was a cross-sectional observational study of PsA patients aged 18 years and older selected from 24 centres across 5 countries (UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain) between July 2021 and March 2022 (IRAS: 287039). Patients attending a face-to-face appointment with a diagnosis of PsA made by a rheumatologist were selected by systematic sampling at each centre and treated in routine clinical practice. Patient and disease characteristics, current treatment and treatment decisions (medications unchanged, switched, added or reduced) were recorded. The analysis was descriptive, with no imputation of missing data. Results 503 patients were included, with arthritis subtype, patient age, disease activity and duration shown (Table 1). Physician- and patient-reported disease severity was highest in the UK, where median patient age was lowest. Conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDS constituted a higher percentage of current PsA treatment in UK than continental Europe (66.4% vs 44.9%), whereas biologic use was more frequent in Europe (68.1% vs 36.4%). Adalimumab was the most commonly used biologic in the UK and Spain. Adalimumab and secukinumab were equally used in Germany, and ixekizumab and adalimumab were joint-first in Italy. Implementing change to the current PsA treatment was most common in the UK, predominantly being a treatment increase. This may reflect the higher level of disease activity or younger patient age in the UK than other countries, as treatment escalation is more likely earlier in the disease course. In the UK, treatment escalation was more commonly achieved by medication addition (26.2%) than medication switch (14%) or dose increase (7.5%). In Europe, medication addition and switch were of more similar frequency (10.9% vs 9.85%). Conclusion Disease characteristics and treatment strategies varied between countries, but particularly between UK and the rest of Europe. In contrast to mainland Europe, csDMARDs predominated in the UK, perhaps reflecting current NICE guidelines. Treatment escalation was most common in the UK, in keeping with higher disease activity. (Table Presented).

COVID-19 vaccination, dengue hepatitis, and recurrent unilateral anterior uveitis.

A 36-year-old Asian Indian male presented with redness and pain in his right eye of 1 week duration. He was diagnosed to have right acute anterior uveitis and had a history of being admitted at a local hospital for dengue hepatitis a month earlier. He had been on adalimumab 40 mg three weekly once and oral methotrexate 20 mg/week for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) B27 spondyloarthropathy and recurrent anterior uveitis. Our patient had re-activation of his anterior chamber inflammation on three distinct occasions: first, 3 weeks following recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the second after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and the third after recovery from dengue fever-associated hepatitis. We propose molecular mimicry and bystander activation as the postulated mechanisms for the re-activation of his anterior uveitis. In conclusion, patients with auto-immune diseases can have recurrent ocular inflammation following COVID-19 or its vaccination or dengue fever as seen in our patient. The anterior uveitis is usually mild and responds to topical steroids. Additional immuno-suppression may not be needed. Mild ocular inflammation following vaccination should not deter individuals from getting COVID-19 vaccination.

From Covid to Bovid to Ovid: A Case of Disseminated Cryptococcus Neoformans

Case Report: Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection caused by the encapsulated yeast Cryptococcus, with C. neoformans and C. gattii being the most common species to cause human disease. Immunocompromised individuals are predisposed to infections with C. neoformans, which has known predilection to CNS and pulmonary lymph nodes. We present a unique case of disseminated cryptococcosis in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cirrhosis, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use and steroid use for COVID19. Method(s): A single-patient case report was conducted after IRB approval. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old woman with uncontrolled diabetes, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis on adalimumab, hepatitis C status post boceprevir, cirrhosis, former IV drug use, and ESRD on hemodialysis via bovine arterial-venous fistula graft presented with worsening dyspnea, cough, and altered mental status. Three months prior, patient was admitted to an outside hospital for COVID19, complicated by pulmonary embolism status post anticoagulation therapy. Patient was treated with an unknown steroid regimen, which was continued by a second outside facility when symptoms failed to improve. Patient then presented to our facility 24 hours after discharge due to continued symptoms. On admission, patient was noted to have altered mentation and hypoxia with pulmonary edema on chest x-ray and was urgently hemodialyzed. Further work-up was obtained due to non-resolving symptoms, including blood and sputum cultures, cocci serology and QuantiFERON gold. CT chest revealed bilateral consolidations. Patient was started on antibiotics for presumed hospital-acquired pneumonia. During the hospital stay, preliminarily blood cultures grew yeast and patient was started on Micafungin. However, Micafungin was changed to Liposomal Amphotericin B as ovoid structures seen on gram stain could not confirm nor rule out cryptococcus. Subsequent bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, as well as final blood cultures resulted Cryptococcus neoformans. Serum cryptococcus antigen returned reactive, titer 1:512. Antibiotics were discontinued and Isavuconazonium was started with Liposomal Amphotericin B. Due to recurrent headaches, lumbar puncture was obtained and revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis without cryptococcal antigenicity. Patient completed 14 days of Liposomal Amphotericin B and Isavuconazole with continuation of Isavuconazole upon discharge. Conclusion(s): Disseminated cryptococcosis in non-HIV patients is rare in the modern HIV era. Clinicians should be aware and include it in their differential of any patient with multiple risk factors for opportunistic infection. In patients with cirrhosis and ESRD, treatment is limited given altered pharmacokinetics. Studies have shown improved survival with the addition of Isavuconazole in patients with disseminated cryptococcosis with CNS involvement in the setting of chronic liver disease and ESRD.

Two years of the COVID-19 pandemic in the population of Czech patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological therapy*experience of the tertiary IBD center.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with a more severe course of infections and a different response to vaccination, especially in complicated IBD course and in association with immune-modifying IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to describe COVID-19 pandemic during years 2020 2022 in IBD patients with long-Term biological therapy. Method(s): A retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence in the population of 1,177 IBD (Crohn s disease or ulcerative colitis) patients with long-Term biological therapy (IBD cohort) was performed. The incidence rate, crude incidence rate and standardized incidence ratio of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort, the odds ratio of infection depending on the type of biologic therapy administered, the dynamics of COVID-19 incidence depending on the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the population and the current vaccination coverage of the IBD cohort were calculated. Result(s): From January 2020 to April 2022, 548 confirmed cases of COVID-19 (46.6%) were reported in the IBD cohort, with 39% share of PCR positivity in vaccinated individuals and with 95% occurrence of infection in unvaccinated part of the IBD cohort. Standardized incidence rate ratio of COVID-19 was 27% higher in the IBD cohort compared to the general Czech population. The dynamics of the development of the number of positive cases of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort was identical to the situation in the entire country. A higher odds ratio of the chances of infection was demonstrated in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but not in patients treated with anti-integrins or monoclonal antibodies against interleukins. In the IBD cohort, 85.2% of patients were properly vaccinated, which was significantly more than the vaccination rate of the entire Czech population. Discussion and conclusion: During the two pandemic years, the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with severe IBD and long-Term biological treatment was higher compared to the general Czech population, despite the favorable vaccination coverage of this high-risk patients group. A higher risk was associated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy.Copyright © 2023 Galen s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

Drug-induced pericarditis

Though not common, drug-induced pericarditis is a serious condition, since pericardial tamponade, should it develop, may be life-threatening. As the number of drugs is constantly expanding, so does the proportion of those capable of causing pericarditis. The authors reviewed the relevant literature in the PubMed database and complemented it with information from the VigiBase database. In their article, the authors present current knowledge about the mechanisms of origin and level of risk of drug-induced pericarditis and discuss relevant information on individual drugs divided into 7 classes. Some medicines are associated with a high risk of developing pericarditis, a fact to be taken into account when treating patients with these agents. © 2022 Czech Society of Cardiology Z.S. All rights reserved.

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Flare-Up after Both Doses of BBIBP-CorV Vaccination in a Patient under Adalimumab Treatment: A Case Report.

Generalized pustular psoriasis is a possibly serious condition that can be triggered by various factors. Previous studies show a slight likelihood of disease exacerbation subsequent to COVID-19 vaccination. Here, we present the first (to the best of our knowledge) case of pustular psoriasis flare after each one of the two shots of the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine despite adalimumab treatment.

Impact of major medication discontinuation during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic on the risk of early relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A French observational retrospective study

Background: The prevalence of nonadherence to major treatments and the subsequent adverse outcomes in IBD patients during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic remain scarce Aim: To investigate the risk of early disease relapse in a cohort of IBD patients under immunosuppressants and/or biologics who decided themselves to discontinue their IBD-related major treatments without previous medical advice during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic Methods: All consecutive patients with inactive IBD under immunosuppressants and/or biologics who acknowledged having withdrawn their major therapy for IBD without previous medical advice during the first wave of COVID-19 (from March 2020 to December 2020) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the survival rate without disease relapse. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for time from inclusion to IBD relapse and a logistic regression model with uni- and multivariate analyses was performed to identify predictors of relapse after drug discontinuation Results: During the study period, among the 862 IBD patients followed as outpatients either treated with infliximab or vedolizumab (outpatient clinics n= 368) or treated with oral azathioprine, adalimumab golimumab or ustekinumab alone or in combination (n= 494), 54 patients (6.2 %) (42 CD, 12 UC, 28 F, median age 36 years) who had discontinued themselves their IBD-related major therapy without previous medical advice were included. The median duration of drug withdrawal was 7.0 weeks (range 2-24) and the median time to relapse was 9.0 weeks (range 4-20). The most treatments withdrawn were adalimumab (n=19), ustekinumab (n=19), azathioprine (n= 12), golimumab (n=1) and a lesser degree infliximab (n=7) eand vedolizumab (n=6). During the median follow-up period of 24 weeks (range 5-42), 22 out of 54 patients (40.7 %) who discontinued their IBD treatment experienced a relapse in whom 6 requiring administration of oral steroids, 4 hospitalization and 2 IBD-related surgery By univariate analysis, past IBD related surgery was identified as the only predictor of disease relapse after drug withdrawal (OR=3.3 CI 95 % [1.08-10.38] Conclusion(s): In IBD patients, major treatment discontinuation by the patients themselves without medical advices during the first wave of pandemic Covid-19 including the lockdown was associated with a substantial risk of disease relapse occurring in around 4 out of 10 patients and subsequent further risk of need for steroids, hospitalization and surgery. Strategies targeting the adherence to therapy and patient's informations about the real risks leading to drug discontinuation are of paramount interest, especially during health crisis to minimize such issues.

Methodology, efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in treating inflammatory bowel disease

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), as an emerging therapy, can be used to treat microbiota related diseases. Progresses in donor screening, washed microbiota preparation, microbiota delivery routes, clinical administrative strategies, and long-term safety are moving FMT forward. Increasing clinical studies, especially those randomized controlled trials about ulcerative colitis and pilot real-word studies about serious inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have been conducted. This review presents the latest findings about the efficacy, safety and methodology of FMT in treating IBD.Copyright © 2020 The Authors

A Comprehensive Mini-review on COVID-19 Pathogenesis on Perspectives of Cytokine Storm and Recent Developments in Anti-Covid Nucleotide Analogues

The world has been rocked by the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has significantly changed our way of life. Despite the unusual measures taken, COVID-19 still exists and affects people all over the world. A remarkable amount of study has been done to find ways to combat the infection's unsurpassed level. No ground-breaking antiviral agent has yet been introduced to remove COVID-19 and bring about a return to normalcy, even though numerous pharmaceuticals and therapeutic technologies have been reused and discovered. The cytokine storm phenomenon is of utmost importance since fatality is strongly connected with the severity of the disease. This severe inflammatory phenomenon marked by increased amounts of inflammatory mediators can be targeted for saving patients' life. Our analysis demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specifically generates a lot of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and results in lymphocyte exhaustion. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 inhibitor that is currently thought to be both generally safe and effective. Additionally, corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors could be effective and dependable methods to reduce cytokine-mediated storm in SARS-CoV-2 patients.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 Vaccine among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A medical center hospital-based study in central Taiwan

Background: In 2020, the world faced the unprecedented crisis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 infection resulted in many complications for IBD patients. However, the association of IBD patients with COVID-19 who had been vaccinated receiving biologics, immunomodulators, or steroids therapies is lacking in Taiwan. Thus, we hypothesized that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic would have some effects on IBD patients who were vaccinated and performed this retrospective study. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with IBD receiving biologics, immunomodulators, or steroids therapies in a medical center hospital in middle Taiwan. Method(s): From January 1980 to October 2022, a total of 286 consecutive patients with IBD (UC: 184 patients;CD: 102 patients) was enrolled into our current study. There were 155 patients had received vaccine for at least one dose. Finally, 51 patients who were vaccinated still suffered from COVID-19 with an infection rate of 32.9%. We analyzed the clinical manifestations of COVID-19-positive in IBD patients. Clinical characteristic, and treatment outcomes of all patients with COVID-19 who had been vaccinated were analyzed. Result(s): The mean diagnostic age of these enrolled patients was 45.1years. Male accounted for the majority of our all patients in the study (76.5%). There were 54.1% patients had received COVID-19 vaccine for at least one dose. The mean dose of COVID-19 vaccine was 2.16. Patients with UC presented significantly higher infection rate of COVID-19 than patients with CD. (Table 1). The most common clinical manifestations were sore throat, followed by fever, cough, runny nose and fatigue. The most common type of biologics used in these patients with IBD was Vedolizumab, followed by Adalimumab and Infliximab. There were no differences in the COVID-19 infection rate in different treatment groups among patients with UC or CD patients(Table 2, 3). Conclusion(s): Our current study showed the risk of COVID-19 in IBD patients is not specifically higher than the general population. Our 51 patients with COVID-19 infection had a good outcome and none one needed hospitalization. Patients with UC presented significantly higher infection rate of COVID-19 than patients with CD. The use of biologics or immunomodulators was not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The use of steroids was also not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 in patients with IBD if steroids were held two weeks or decreased dosage before vaccinations. Furthermore, we found that IBD patients under adequate therapy can reduce the severity of COVID-19.

A case of de novo seronegative inflammatory oligoarthritis associated with COVID-19 infection

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus is characterized by an acute respiratory viral illness, often accompanied by extrapulmonary manifestations. Musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgias and arthralgias are observed in 60 - 70% of cases. Inflammatory arthritis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported in the literature, however, nearly all such cases describe a post-viral or reactive phenomenon occurring a few weeks following the infection. We report a unique case of de novo arthritis at the onset of a confirmed COVID-19 infection in a 55-year-old woman. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated synovial enhancement consistent with synovitis. Her disease was deemed refractory after failing several immunosuppressive agents. Lastly, we compare our patient's clinical presentation with two other similar cases to understand the natural history of this emerging syndrome.Copyright © 2022

Novelties of COVID-19 vaccination beyond efficacy: Nationwide experiences with trough levels, durability, and disease activity among inflammatory bowel disease patients

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has raised issues in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under different treatments in IBD patients and identify predictive factors associated with lower serological response, including anti-TNF drug levels. Method(s): A prospective, multicentre study of IBD patients was conducted following mRNA and non-mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Healthy control (HC) patients were enrolled to reduce bias. Baseline and week 14 samples were obtained following the second dose to assess the impact of conventional and biological treatments. Clinical and biochemical activity, serological response level, and anti-TNF drug levels were measured. Result(s): This study included 199 IBD (Table 1.;mean age, 40.9 +/- 12.72 years) and 77 HC participants. Most patients (76.9%) and all HCs received mRNA vaccines. Half of the IBD patients were on biological treatment (Table 2.;anti-TNF 68.7%). Combined immunomodulation and biological treatment were associated with lower serological response (Figure 1.;p<0.001), and mRNA vaccination promoted better antibody levels (p<0.001). Higher adalimumab levels caused lower serological response (p=0.006). W8 persistence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 level was equal in IBD and HC groups (Figure 2.;p>0.05). Vaccination had no impact on disease activity. Conclusion(s): Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is considerably efficacious in IBD patients, with mRNA vaccines promoting better antibody levels. The negative impact of combined biological treatment, especially with high adalimumab drug levels, on serological response to vaccination should be considered. Although mid-term durability of vaccination is encouraging, more data are needed to expand existing understanding on this issue.

Adalimumab, Ustekinumab, and Secukinumab in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of the Real-Life Experience.

To date, adalimumab (ADA) is the only biotechnology drug approved for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), an inflammatory skin condition. However, it quickly became apparent that the efficacy of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. In our review, we highlighted the current evidence from literature on the use of biologics in HS in a real-life setting, particularly adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab. Data on the effectiveness and safety of biologic drugs in HS management have been analyzed. Even if the results are promising, more studies are needed. In our opinion, the armamentarium of drugs for HS management is increasing, and treatment will be based on a tailored-tail approach, minimizing the risk of adverse events. In this context, we want to point out the reported effectiveness and safety data concerning adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab as well as ixekizumab.

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper.

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.